tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post2648322823316402243..comments2023-11-05T04:28:29.961-08:00Comments on Adventures in Capitalism: Kobe UpdateChrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00927628412285314176noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post-40979377592654944112012-03-31T10:10:31.072-07:002012-03-31T10:10:31.072-07:00Use the money -- but for alternative therapies tha...Use the money -- but for alternative therapies that will at least not cause this beauty to suffer in the last stage of her life. <br /><br />I believe radiation therapy deteriorates quality of life in other ways, especially with animals. I am not qualified to give medical advice. <br /><br />I would spend the money on making sure she gets natural, 100% organic dog food, omegas, that she's on vitamins, pain-killing and anti-inflammation medications, etc. I'm sure there is a whole cadre of alternative health vets in the Bay Area. I would use the $6,000 -- and more -- doing that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post-89882506115536057392012-03-31T03:35:49.246-07:002012-03-31T03:35:49.246-07:00Agree with the first comment. I don't believe ...Agree with the first comment. I don't believe in artificially extending the life of anyone, be that a relative or a pet. Time to come to terms with reality. If this somehow sounds cruel let me say that I wouldn't want anyone to extend my life because they wanted to spend more time with me at the expense of causing me a lot of pain either. Just make your dog's remaining time as pleasant as you can. That's all I would do.ranndinonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post-3792870671373601912012-03-30T23:06:48.657-07:002012-03-30T23:06:48.657-07:00I would pay $6,000, no question. Thanks for asking...I would pay $6,000, no question. Thanks for asking.Thietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post-13029568706691399302012-03-30T18:31:08.970-07:002012-03-30T18:31:08.970-07:00Not sure what I'd do. Just wanted to say that ...Not sure what I'd do. Just wanted to say that I'm sorry that you're having to make this decision and knowing how close I am with my dog, I can't imagine how difficult your choice is.Paul Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14083846917958972987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2460005.post-349327550456522802012-03-30T16:43:27.781-07:002012-03-30T16:43:27.781-07:00I would focus on what I could (sort of) control:
...I would focus on what I could (sort of) control:<br /><br />Kobe's pain<br />The quality of the time Kobe has left<br /><br />I would seek not to put her into painful treatment, and maximize the quality of her remaining time with the family. <br /><br />But she's not my dog. What I can tell you is that I wish my father had not extended our second and third dogs' lives the way that he did - the girls were in a great deal of discomfort, and it was just heartbreaking when they could no longer climb stairs, would fall when attempting to do things, etc. All because my dad wanted more time with them. It struck me as selfish and, on some level, inhumane. (I should add that this was a mother and daughter pair of dogs. My father was very attached to the mother, who passed in 2001. Her daughter passed about a year ago. He still can't even talk about the momma dog without becoming emotional, and I think he held on way too long to her daughter because she was the last connection. But I think it was unintentionally cruel.)Jackie Dhttp://jackiedanicki.comnoreply@blogger.com